Embarrassing Lockerbie coverage will continue … in the USA

This morning I asked a lobby journalist whether the “oil for al-Megrahi scandal” [©Chambers 2009] had legs. We both agreed that it didn’t for long: the published letters would give nothing substantial away, some would claim the wrong letters had been published (such as David Jones MP), but without further proof, the issue would die as MPs returned from the recess.

Now I have changed my mind. We were mostly right about the letters – and indeed the coverage and interviews have failed to throw up any substantial new leads¹. Perhaps Bill Rammell put pressure on the Scottish Executive but Alex Salmond has been redoubtable in his televised efforts to vindicate his government and even caused one BBC journalist to apologise to him.

Where we were wrong was on whether it was necessary for there to be new leads. The coverage would probably not have continued for much longer in the UK but the US media are determined to keep pressing on this issue.

This is because, in 2 weeks or so, Gordon Brown will be visiting Pittsburgh for the G20 summit. The al-Megrahi story will now dominate his visit to the USA, despite the refusal of the US government to discuss this issue anymore. US cable news will start to do what it does best: clamour. Watch the video below of NBC’s Chief White House Correspondent Chuck Todd on “Morning Joe” for what’s to come for Brown.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “msnbc.com Video Player“, posted with vodpod

¹UPDATE 1st September: Ok, so this Bill Rammell issue is becoming quite big but it in no way shows that Megrahi was released for oil. Mr Rammell purportedly said: “Neither the Prime Minister nor the Foreign Secretary would want Mr Megrahi to die in prison but the decision on transfer lies in the hands of Scottish Ministers”. This is no smoking gun. The issue once again is Gordon Brown’s opinion – quite a different issue to corruption.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Embarrassing Lockerbie coverage will continue … in the USA”

  1. Niall Says:

    Doesn’t David Miliband’s interview on Today raise more questions? He confirmed that both he and the PM did not wish to see Al-Megrahi die in jail… it thus follows that both approve of his release.

    If DM feels comfortable talking about it, why not the PM?

    The major inconsistency in the government’s position is that Bill Rammell was happy to tell the Libyans what the PM thought, but the PM was unable to tell the British public.

  2. Joshua Chambers Says:

    Well apparently the PM will now make a statement on the issue. However, the issue is only that of whether they agreed with compassionate release, not whether they had anything to do with it.

    It’s becoming an “academic” question, as Alex Salmond was attempting to portray it yesterday in his interviews. The only headline now would be “PM agreed with unpopular decision made by Scottish Executive”. Nothing else can be proven and that kind of story can’t keep running and won’t prompt independent inquiries or continued media pressure over weeks.

    I still think by next week other issues will emerge, although undoubtedly DC will want to raise the issue at PMQs. Afghanistan elections are the biggest political issue at the moment and will move the spotlight away from this.

  3. New evidence means the Megrahi scandal will also continue in the UK « Joshua Chambers’ Political Review Says:

    […] Posts Four articles worth a gander (and a video)About me:InterviewsSome things I've doneEmbarrassing Lockerbie coverage will continue … in the USAAn evening's reflectionBig news story this evening? Afghanistan.Angela Watkinson MP's Tax […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: